The Question:
Creation vs Evolution: Which Do you Believe In?
DP wrote on July 12, 2007:
In short Evolution, but not as to why but as to how.
Evolution we can pretty much take as scientific fact and have monutains of evidence to back this. Further studies into genetics that have taken place for years and continue to do so as we unravel the mysteries about DNA have given us strong suggestions that we share common traits with other mamalls and are different because as we exist in different environments we have adapted in different ways, evolving into different yet similar species. I wont go into too much science as I am terrible at it.
Science however is an interesting thing for creationism. The purpose of science as most people see it is to discover the functions of our natural world, sure we know things happen but how do they or how did they happen is a question which has lead to the constant progression of mankind. Creationists, if we can call them that, seem to believe in presuppositions, or that we know how it happened it was the work of god and he did it like this, and then work to fit the science to that theory. This in my oppinion goes aginst science itself! In their defence creationists say it is better to have something to start with so you know how and why and can just fit things together, but this creates a bias and clouded judgement which could keep them from unlocking teh real secrets of the natural world. If your mind is biased and the “solution” is already in your head then ofcourse you will see only what you want to.
As for the bible it is amazing that somone can deny the progress of hundreds of years of science and discovery based on text written thousdans of years ago by men who had no such means of understanding the smallest details in teh natural world beyond the observation of what was happening around them. Perhaps the Bible is not the be all and end all to life on earth and how it came to be, but perhaps a metaphor for us to comprehend the magnificence of the world that surrounds us and a way of teaching to people morality, good an evil. Perhaps, if we looked at the Bible with a little bit more innocence.
To reply to this post, please do so in the comments section below.
For a complete archive of posts relating to Creation vs Evolution, click here.
Cast your vote in the poll on Creation vs Evolution!
Join the discussion on Facebook!
You know, creationists are constantly accused of not really knowing about evolution. Sorry, we have to know the theory
as well as the evolutionists because we start out with it in school and as we progress in scientific observation and
testing of evolution in all of our studies.
Evolution has based its data on a lot of hoaxes, frauds,
and false assumptions.
Example: Nebraska man is created out of a single pig’s tooth. The whole tribe showed up in exibits. That is until the rest of the pig was found.
Haeckel’s embryos: Made up drawings in text books.
Debunked long ago but still in ’some’ text books.
This ‘adaptation’ claim is just that. No one can tell us how anything ‘adapts’, just that it does.
What was ‘it’ to begin with? How did ‘it’survive over millions of years until ‘it’ adapted to be able to survive?
There are gaps so large from the beginnings to the final result that no one has a clue.
Mutations, which are 99% bad, are the magic miracle
science results. But first the magic of RANDOM CHANCE
gave us all this order and complexity.
A mindless nothing called ‘chance’ thought up and built
all we can observe today.
I doubt the evolutionists will even read this. Creationism
will someday deprive them of their ‘cash cow’ and
show what real science is.
I’ll have more in my next comment. And there is much more.